Are tank tops that cost $60 better than tank tops that cost say...$12? I'm just wondering because every tank top I've ever tried on, owned, worn to the beach, worn to bed, worn to work, worn under a sweater, worn by itself, blah, blah, blah, no matter how much they cost, seem to fit just about the same way...and they are TANK TOPS...I can't spend $60 on a tank top. I don't care if it does have sequence on it! Unless my name is Oprah, I'm not doing it. I refuse.
sorry, this is one just the ladies will (or might not) relate to...
sorry, this is one just the ladies will (or might not) relate to...
posted by The Funky Bee @ 11/21/2005 11:18:00 PM
4 Comments:
At 12:02 PM, November 22, 2005,
wopanese said…
Well... of COURSE they're better!
better for the retailer, at least.
At 6:53 PM, November 22, 2005,
The Funky Bee said…
HA! I love that you all are as crazy about this as me. Don't get me wrong...silk, fur, gold plated clothing, sure...those cost some moneys...cotton. I REFUSE! I REFUSE I SAY!!!
At 2:14 AM, November 23, 2005,
peachy said…
Don't do it! The two for one deals are the best, but you should never pay over 15 for a tank top. Now is a good time to get them on sale.
At 6:51 PM, November 23, 2005,
ago-go said…
you are exactly right. it's just like with t-shirts. why should i pay 60 or even 30$ for a t-shirt? it'd better be a damn special t-shirt/tank top that does my laundry and pays my bills for 60$! seriously man, it's just cotton.
Post a Comment
<< Home